If you only treat the symptom you'll never cure the underlying problem, and the symptoms will just return again and again.
The above is a paraphrase/summation of a bit of wisdom my father taught me as I was growing up. He had to repeat it a time or two because I was a young idealist bent on saving the world and quite convinced I had the PLAN. He would calmly talk me through to the logical conclusion of whatever my latest PLAN happened to be thereby showing me I had, once again, not thought it through.
This concept is nicely demonstrated in the old adage, "Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime."
Its antithesis, however, can be found in the rallying cry, "There ought to be a law!" It seems that, or some variation thereof, is all I ever hear anyone say anymore.
- I lost my job; we need to make a law to take care of me.
- Someone offended me; there should be law.
- That private business lets people smoke near me; we've got to fix that.
- Those bikers are getting hit, going to the hospital and driving up insurance prices; helmet law!
- ...and so on.
I'd like to insert here a completely impractical wish. I would love for everyone who wants a piece of quick fix legislation enacted which is designed to save him/her from the vagaries of fate or the consequences of his/her own actions to have to attach to it another bill designed to help some other poor slob with his/her individual problem such that providing for the second bill would have direct negative consequences on the proponent of the first bill.
If everyone had to take a personal hit each time he/she tried to hit up everyone else for his/her own solution I wonder how long it would take before folks quit running to Uncle Sam for a hand out and started finding other more personally responsible solutions to their own problems.
Interesting. This reminds me of something that Ralph Nader said last year when running for Pres. He said something to the effect of, “If elected, I will propose a bill that will require each senator who votes for a war action to also volunteer one of their children or close relative to go over.” While I’m not a Nader supporter, and I don’t really agree with the exact sentiment he was going for, I thought it was an interesting concept and maybe should be applied in the future.
ReplyDeleteAnd I agree. There should be very few Federal laws banning or requiring anything. Personal choice and responsibility needs to be paramount.